NEGOTIATING FOR BETTER, MORE
APPROPRIATE LOAN TERMS

FOR YOUR FARM BUSINESS

 

Cooperative Extension Service

Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics

University of Georgia

 

June 2002

 

Prepared by Cesar L. Escalante, Assistant Professor


Download this document in WordPerfect... negot.doc (137 Kb)
View/download this document in Adobe Acrobat... negot.pdf (412 Kb)
 

This primer is designed to provide a guide to prospective farm borrowers on important lending terms and conditions to guide them in their credit negotiations with their lending institutions.  In any credit transaction, the proper packaging of a loan must be ideally beneficial to both the borrower and the lender.  A loan transaction provides the borrower with the funds needed to implement business plans and improve liquidity conditions while allowing the lender to earn reasonable income that will help sustain the lending business.

At times, however, the borrower's failure to fully repay his/her loan is a consequence of faulty packaging of loan terms and conditions.  Under these situations, the borrower’s repayment capabilities given expected cash flow and liquidity conditions either have not been realistically assessed or do not match with the repayment provisions stipulated in the loan covenant.

The choice of specific loan terms and conditions must not only conform to lenders’ expectations of their profit and liquidity conditions.  More importantly, the lender should carefully adapt certain terms and conditions to a realistic projection of the borrower’s financial condition, liquidity structure and repayment capacity.  The following sections will discuss several attributes of the loan package that need to be carefully matched with specific borrower types.

 

 

 

A.  Loan Maturities and Purpose

 

 

Definitions

 

In terms of maturities, the USDA reports categorize farm credits into farm real estate and agricultural production loans.  Farm real estate loans may be either intermediate term or long-term in nature.  Farm real estate properties and other farm assets are the preferred security for this type of loans that are used for the acquisition of farm assets.

Intermediate-term loans, with terms ranging from 18 months to 10 years, are used to finance the acquisition of such depreciable assets as farm machinery and equipment, breeding livestock and improvements.  At times, these loans may also be used to finance additional working capital requirements of the farm business in order to restructure the borrower’s balance sheet (Ellinger and Barry). 

Long-term loans carry a term of more than 10 years and are used to finance the acquisition, construction and development of land and buildings.

Agricultural production loans are used to cover the farm’s short-term liquidity needs and are used to finance operating expenses.  This credit facility has short-term maturity, ranging from 3 to 18 months, that ideally matches the length of the agricultural production cycle.  Lenders usually package these loans as lines-of-credit financing under a credit commitment.  Under this arrangement, the loan covenant stipulates the amount and timing of the disbursements and payments of the loan.

A line-of credit facility could either be revolving or non-revolving.  Under a revolving line-of-credit, the borrower may draw on the line more than once as needed subject to a cap on the cumulative amount of the drawings and a specified time period.  A non-revolving line-of-credit entitles the borrower to a specified amount of funds and does not allow successive drawings on the line even after repayment of the drawn funds.

 

 

Discussion:  Common Pitfalls

 

Borrowers should always understand that lenders would never make loan decisions that they perceive to be detrimental to their institution's overall financial health.  In this regard, the lender only decides to grant a loan under terms and conditions, including the amount and maturity of the loan, that are favorable from the lending institution's perspective. 

In times of high income and credit risk in the agricultural sector, the farm lenders normally implement risk management strategies reflected in the nature of credit decisions they make.  The following are a couple of possible strategies lenders might implement to protect their interests in a credit transaction.

 

a.  Lending Less Than Requested

A lender may opt to reduce risk exposure to the farm sector by lending less than the amount they usually lend to farm borrowers.  Thus, farmers have to make do with borrowed funds less than the amount their businesses actually require. If the farmer is unable to seek elsewhere the remaining amount of funding required by his/her farm, the farmer may not be able to realize the full potential of his/her farm business. There is considerable risk and danger in pursuing a business project even if the amount available to finance the project is less than what is actually required.  The borrower stands to lose more by pursuing project plans with deficient funding endowments.

 

b.  Shorter Maturities

A lender may also opt to continue granting exactly the amount of loans requested by farm borrowers but limits the term of the loan.  Shortening the term of the loan by even a few years may have detrimental effects on the viability of the farm business.  Shorter loan terms result in larger periodic payments for the borrowers, which, in turn, could create cash flow or liquidity problems for the farm.  An extreme example is a farmer who acquires new machinery and equipment using the proceeds of a one-year credit line.  Machinery investments are usually larger than ordinary operating expenses so that ideally machinery and equipment loans should be financed by intermediate term loans with average maturities of 5 to 7 years.  A mismatching of the purpose and term of the loan can create severe liquidity and viability problems for the farm business.

The following example illustrates how (equal) quarterly loan amortization payments for a $500,000 machinery loan change as the term of the loan is reduced at different interest rate levels:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 1:  Equal Quarterly Loan Amortization Payments

For a $500,000 Machinery Loan

 

 

Maturity (Years)

6% per annum

8% per annum

10% per annum

 

Quarterly Payment

($)

% Change from 1 Year Reduction from Previous Longer Term

 

Quarterly Payment

($)

% Change from 1 Year Reduction from Previous Longer Term

 

Quarterly Payment

($)

% Change from 1 Year Reduction from Previous Longer Term

Seven

22,001

 

23,495

 

25,044

 

Six

24,962

13.46

26,436

12.52

27,956

11.63

Five

29,123

16.67

30,578

15.67

32,074

14.73

Four

35,383

21.49

36,825

20.43

38,299

19.41

Three

45,840

29.56

47,280

28.39

48,744

27.27

Two

66,792

45.71

68,255

44.36

69,734

43.06

One

129,722

94.22

131,312

92.38

132,909

90.60

 

The above summary indicates that the quarterly loan amortization increases from a range of about 12% to 94% with every one-year reduction in the term of the loan.  The incremental amortization payment becomes increasingly larger as the term of the loan approaches one year.  Moreover, increases in interest rates translate to larger absolute increases in loan amortization payments for every one-year term reduction.

It is therefore important for the borrower and the lender to ascertain whether or not the liquidity structure of the farm business will be able to afford increased loan amortizations arising from a reduction in the term of the loan.

 

 

B.  Payment Arrangements

 

Farm borrowers should be cognizant of demand clauses in the loan agreement.  These provisions allow the lender to demand payment from the borrower at any time during the life of the loan.

In the absence of these provisions, loans availed of under a line-of-credit financing arrangement are usually repaid when the borrower has surplus funds during the stipulated length of the credit line.

Repayment of intermediate- and long-term loans, on the other hand, follow a payment (or amortization) schedule prepared by the lender that specifies principal and interest payments (amortizations) to be paid at certain maturity dates over the life of the loan.

There are at least three payments options to consider for the repayment of intermediate- and long-term loans:

 

1)      Fixed, Equal Payments:  A fixed amount covering principal and interest charges is paid at stipulated amortization dates.  This fixed amount is calculated based on specified interest rate and maturity (term) of the loan.  Thus, loan amortizations are fixed and equal over the specified term of the loan.  Each loan payment is allocated between principal and interest, with principal payments accounting for larger portions of the equal installment amount as the loan approaches maturity.

 

2)      Fixed Principal Payments:  Under this scheme, the original loan amount is repaid in equal principal installment payments over the life of the loan.  Interest charges are then calculated based on declining principal balances.  Farm borrowers must evaluate their liquidity and cash flow conditions in considering this payment option.  The farm’s ability to adequately cash flow should coincide with the larger initial payments of principal and interest that are typically required under this arrangement.  In general, this payment method results in less total interest charges over the life of the loan since a relatively larger portion of the loan amount is retired earlier compared to the fixed, equal payment scheme.

 

The following table provides a comparison of the loan amortization schedules under the fixed equal and fixed principal payment schemes:

 

Table 2:  Loan Amortization Schedules

$500,000 Five-Year Term Loan, 8% p.a. payable annually

Under Fixed Equal and Fixed Principal Payment Arrangements

 

Year

Loan Balance

Principal (P) Payment

Interest  (I) Payment

Total P & I Payment

A.  Fixed, Equal Amortization

1

414,772

85,228

40,000

125,228

2

322,725

92,046

33,182

125,228

3

223,315

99,410

25,818

125,228

4

115,952

107,363

17,865

125,228

5

0

115,952

9,276

125,228

B.  Fixed Equal Principal Payments

1

400,000

100,000

40,000

140,000

2

300,000

100,000

32,000

132,000

3

200,000

100,000

24,000

124,000

4

100,000

100,000

16,000

116,000

5

0

100,000

8,000

108,000

 

Another version of this comparison that calculates amortization payments on a quarterly, instead of annual, basis is presented in Appendix 1 for further reference.

 

3)      Balloon Payment:  These are relatively shorter-term loans.  Under this arrangement, initial payments are usually based on a longer amortization period (such as 20 years) under the assumption that at the end of a certain shorter period (for example, after the first five years of the term) the loan with either be paid off, renewed or re-financed.  In other words, at the end of the shorter period agreed upon, the entire unpaid balance of the loan becomes due so the borrower has the option to pay the amount in full or negotiate for new loan terms.  Table 3 presents an example of a balloon payment type of arrangement:

 

Table 3:  Loan Amortization Schedule

$500,000 Loan, 8% p.a. payable annually

Equal payments for five years (based on 20 year amortization)

 Balloon Payment at end of fifth year

 

Year

Loan Balance

Principal (P) Payment

Interest  (I) Payment

Total P & I Payment

1

481,270

18,730

40,000

58,730

2

461,042

20,228

38,502

58,730

3

439,196

21,846

36,883

58,730

4

415,601

23,594

35,136

58,730

5

390,120

25,482

33,248

58,730

Balloon Payment

390,120

 

 

 

 

 

Based on the above example, the borrower either pays the entire outstanding balance of $390,120 at the end of the fifth year or negotiates for a new set of loan terms.  The borrower’s decision to negotiate further may depend on interest rate conditions.  If at the time of negotiation, interest rates are falling and credit conditions are improving, the borrower may decide to negotiate for more favorable loan terms.  However, if interest rates are rising and the credit situation becomes tight, either the newly negotiated loan terms may be unfavorable or the lender may decide not to renew the loan if the borrower’s risk rating becomes unfavorable.  Again, this scheme needs to be evaluated according to the farm’s ability to generate cash flows that will adequately cover loan amortization payments, especially the bulk payment amount required at the end of the term of the loan.

 

Discussion:  Expected Profitability ą Liquidity

 

Again, the borrower and the lender must consider the farm business' cash flow and liquidity structures in choosing the most appropriate amortization plan for the farmer's term loan.  A glaring oversight that some people make is to consider only expectations surrounding the profit-generating capacity of a certain business project and ignore the resulting cash flow structure.  Expected profitability is not usually translated to favorable liquidity conditions each month or period in the life of a business.  Farming provides a perfect example of a business with some cash flow gaps resulting from the gestation of farm production, or that period ranging from the planting of crops till the time they are harvested, marketed and converted into cash that flows into the farm business. 

Some farming enterprises have longer gestation periods than others.  However, a diversified farm business enjoys the advantage of being able to minimize cash flow gaps during the production year by planning and coordinating properly the end of the production cycles (marking the period for harvesting and marketing) of the enterprises whereby a certain enterprise is able to generate cash inflows that subsidize the cash outflows of the other enterprises that are either just in the early, middle or later stages of the production process.  A more stable cash flow structure for this type of business could well afford either the fixed equal or fixed principal amortization plans.

Highly specialized farm businesses, on the other hand, may have more limited capabilities is spreading out the timing of cash inflows to minimize cash flow gaps.  Liquidity management for existing specialized businesses entail building up adequate cash and/or credit reserves to draw upon while waiting to realize revenues from the business.  These farms should carefully choose the payment plan most appropriate to their cash flow structure.

 

 

 

C.  Interest Rates and Other Loan Pricing Issues

 

A loan may carry either a fixed or variable (or adjustable) interest rate.  A loan may carry a fixed interest rate until the loan is paid off.  Other lenders may offer a fixed rate only for a specified period of time, then the borrower and lender negotiate for either a new fixed rate or a shift to variable pricing thereafter.

A variable or adjustable rate loan involves provisions to change the interest rate based on changes in market conditions, a specified index or other factors determined by the lender.  The intervals in which interest rates change may also be designated, although in some cases decisions to change the interest rate are at the lender’s discretion.

In any case, the borrower should always be aware of the frequency and magnitude of probable changes in the interest rates applied to his/her loan.  Moreover, he/she should be able to calculate the effects of such changes on loan payments.

The following concepts are important in the understanding of the pricing of a particular loan.  These are features of the loan transaction that farm borrowers may negotiate with their lenders.

 

§         Rate buy-down:  A reduction in interest rate can sometimes be negotiated with the lender in exchange for a one-time fee paid at the time of the origination of the loan.  This arrangement is known as a rate buy-down.  The potential benefits of this strategy to the farmer could be evaluated by comparing the present values of payments with and without the rate-buy down scheme.

 

§         Interest rate index: This index is used to determine the level of a variable or adjustable rate.  Examples of indexes used by lenders include their own average cost of funds, the company’s internal rate, one-year Treasury securities rates, 90-day Treasury bills, federal funds rate and the London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR).  The frequency of change in these indexes varies so the borrower is advised to obtain as much information from the lender about this issue.

 

§         Margin: This refers to the percentage points that the lender adds to the interest rate index to determine the price of the loan. Margins are designed to cover the lenders’ loan administration costs, the risk premium associated with the borrower’s credit risks and the lender’s expected profit margin.

 

§         Caps: These establish limits on the change in the level of variable or adjustable interest rates.

 

§         Prepayment Penalty: This is a fee charged by the lender when the loan is paid before maturity.  Some lenders impose this penalty in order to realize the interest income they expect to generate over the life of the loan.  This expected income is minimized by unexpected prepayment of the loan, thus the need for such income re-capture mechanism.

 

§         Late Payment Penalties and Foreclosure Provisions:  A borrower should be aware of penalties associated with late amortization payments as well as grace periods defined in the loan agreements.  Also, the borrower should be cognizant of specific conditions of default, such as the extent of delay in payments and non-payment of amortizations.

 

 

Reference

 

Ellinger, P. N. and P. J. Barry “A Farmer’s Guide to Agricultural Credit.” Center for Farm and Rural Business Finance, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2001.

 

Appendix 1:  Quarterly Amortization Schedules Based on Equal Amortization and Fixed Principal Payment Plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Int. Rate

8.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quarters

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equal P & I

30,578

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equal Principal

25,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EQUAL PRINCIPAL & INTEREST PMTS

       EQUAL PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS

Quarter

Balance

Principal

Interest

Total

Balance

Principal

Interest

Total

Year 0

500,000

 

 

 

500,000

 

 

 

Year 1, Qtr 1

479,422

20,578

10,000

30,578

475,000

25,000

10,000

35,000

Year 1, Qtr 2

458,432

20,990

9,588

30,578

450,000

25,000

9,500

34,500

Year 1, Qtr 3

437,022

21,410

9,169

30,578

425,000

25,000

9,000

34,000

Year 1, Qtr 4

415,184

21,838

8,740

30,578

400,000

25,000

8,500

33,500

Year 2, Qtr 1

392,909

22,275

8,304

30,578

375,000

25,000

8,000

33,000

Year 2, Qtr 2

370,189

22,720

7,858

30,578

350,000

25,000

7,500

32,500

Year 2, Qtr 3

347,015

23,175

7,404

30,578

325,000

25,000

7,000

32,000

Year 2, Qtr 4

323,377

23,638

6,940

30,578

300,000

25,000

6,500

31,500

Year 3, Qtr 1

299,266

24,111

6,468

30,578

275,000

25,000

6,000

31,000

Year 3, Qtr 2

274,673

24,593

5,985

30,578

250,000

25,000

5,500

30,500

Year 3, Qtr 3

249,588

25,085

5,493

30,578

225,000

25,000

5,000

30,000

Year 3, Qtr 4

224,001

25,587

4,992

30,578

200,000

25,000

4,500

29,500

Year 4, Qtr 1

197,903

26,098

4,480

30,578

175,000

25,000

4,000

29,000

Year 4, Qtr 2

171,283

26,620

3,958

30,578

150,000

25,000

3,500

28,500

Year 4, Qtr 3

144,130

27,153

3,426

30,578

125,000

25,000

3,000

28,000

Year 4, Qtr 4

116,434

27,696

2,883

30,578

100,000

25,000

2,500

27,500

Year 5, Qtr 1

88,184

28,250

2,329

30,578

75,000

25,000

2,000

27,000

Year 5, Qtr 2

59,370

28,815

1,764

30,578

50,000

25,000

1,500

26,500

Year 5, Qtr 3

29,979

29,391

1,187

30,578

25,000

25,000

1,000

26,000

Year 5, Qtr 4

0

29,979

600

30,578

0

25,000

500

25,500


Back to previous page

Back to Publications: Farm and Financial Management