|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- Where Have Federal Orders Been
- Where Are Federal Orders Now
- Federal Order Issues Impacting Direction
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
- Smaller marketing areas/more orders
- Specific order provisions
- Less concentration (producers and processors)
- Simpler regulatory amendment process
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- Recent Hearings:
- Emergency Hurricane Relief
- Florida, Appalachian and Southeast
- Hearing held October 7, 2004
- Reimburse handlers for transportation expenses incurred during several
hurricanes
- Effective December 10, 2004
- Classification of Milk
- Interim final rule – April 23, 2004
- Final Order effective December 1, 2004
|
|
8
|
- Southeast Merger
- Hearing held February 23-26, 2004
- Briefs due August 16, 2004
- Decision in progress
- Producer-Handler Exemption
- Hearing held September 23-January 22, 2004
- Tempe, Arizona; Alexandria,
Virginia; Seattle, Washington
- Briefs due August 2, 2004
- 3,117 pages of testimony and 63 exhibits
- Tentative Decision Issued December 23, 2004 – “Double Dipping”
- Decision in progress on P-D issue
|
|
9
|
- Upper Midwest
- Hearing held August 16-19, 2004
- Briefs due October 15, 2004
- Record certified October 28, 2004
- Decision in progress
- Central
- Hearing held December 6-9, 2004
- Pooling standards and other issues
- Briefs due February 18, 2005
|
|
10
|
- Upcoming Hearing:
- Mideast
- Hearing scheduled to begin March 7, 2005
- Pooling provisions and producer-handler exemption
|
|
11
|
- Fluid Milk Product Definition
- Initial request received September 2003
- Proposals due January 31, 2005
- 15A filed by H.P. Hood – Carb Countdown
- Hearing held December 14-15, 2004
- Reviewing proposals received
- Class III and IV Make Allowance Changes
|
|
12
|
- Western Order Termination Impacts
- Pricing/Pooling Issues
- Decision Time Requirements
- Hearing to Effective Interim Amendments:
- Hearing to Effective Amendments
- Possible legislation to address
|
|
13
|
- Phase I: AMS controls process (2.5 months)
- Proposal Received Decision to request additional
proposals
- Hearing Notice Published
(Minimum 15 day notice provided to public preferred)
- Phase II. ALJ controls process
- (2 months)
- Hearing begins
- (3-10 days based on nature of issue under consideration)
- Hearing concludes
- -ALJ establishes transcript correction date and briefing date Obtain
transcript from reporting company
- -Public and USDA review for corrections
- Hearing record corrections completed
|
|
14
|
- Phase III: AMS controls process (2.5 months)
- Record analyzed and economic and policy decisions made (10 weeks)
- Determine type of decision to issue which affects implementation
schedule:
- 1) Tentative/Interim Final Decision
- -issue if hearing
record data supports emergency marketing conditions exist to
warrant immediate implementation
- 2) Recommended Decision
- -issue if hearing
record data does not support immediate implementation of
provisions
- Phase IV. OGC controls process
- (1 month)
- Decision sent to OGC for legal sufficiency
|
|
15
|
- Phase V: USDA controls process (1 month)
- Review and Department Clearance
- (Decision cleared by AMS, MRP, OBPA, OCE, OSEC, others)
- Phase VI. FR controls process
- (3-5 days)
- Decision Issued and Published in Federal Register
|
|
16
|
- SUMMARY:
- Time to Issue Decision from Proposal Receipt:
- Phase I-VI: 9 months, 1 week
- Time to Issue Decision from Hearing Transcript Receipt:
- Phase III-VI: 4 months, 3 weeks
|
|
17
|
- Time to Effectuate Amendments: 11 months
- Time from Proposal to Amendments:
- 20 mo, 1 wk
- Time from Hearing to Amendments:
- 15 mo, 3 wks
|
|
18
|
- Time from Proposal to Interim Amendments: 12 mo, 3 wks
- Time from Hearing to Interim Amendments: 8 mo, 1 wk
- Time from Proposal to Amendments: 18 mo, 3 wks
- Time from Hearing to Amendments:
14 mo, 1 wk
|
|
19
|
- Contract independently with court reporting services
- Issue tentative decisions when possible
- Reviewing internal procedures
- Utilizing more MA staff
- Expediting processes within Dairy Programs control
- Holding pre-hearing discussions
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|